Bb5a31f81ClaimRick Hasen argued that granting the executive branch authority to halt election certifications under the National Voter Registration Act improperly shifts electoral power away from statesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit seeking to block Alaska officials from certifying the 2026 Senate election if Mary Peltola wonAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimWalter Olson of the Cato Institute argued that the Department of Justice's Alaska election lawsuit improperly interprets the National Voter Registration Act to expand federal control over state electionsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the State of Alaska and its Division of Elections director seeking to block certification of the Alaska Senate electionAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Alaska Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge brought by Alaska Republicans regarding ballot compositionAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIan Millhiser argued that the Supreme Court's Purcell principle prohibits federal courts from making election-related rulings in the period immediately preceding an electionAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimWard Clark of RedState argued that Daniel J. Sullivan followed all necessary statutory procedures and legal requirements to run for the United States Senate in AlaskaAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimRick Hasen argued that the National Voter Registration Act does not provide the Department of Justice with statutory authority to block state election certificationsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Alaska Supreme Court ruled in June 2026 that candidate Daniel J. Sullivan legally qualified for inclusion on the Alaska ballotAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn June 2026, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that Daniel J. Sullivan must be included on the primary ballotAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimWalter Olson argued that Alaska's ballot dispelled voter confusion by explicitly labeling Senator Dan Sullivan as the incumbentAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled an emergency hearing regarding the Department of Justice's voting lawsuit against the State of CaliforniaAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimFederal District Judge Kathleen Cardone issued a preliminary injunction enjoining border wall construction in Big Bend National ParkAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe en banc Fifth Circuit ruled 10 to 7 that indefinite detention of noncitizens who entered the United States without inspection does not violate the Due Process ClauseAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimA Ninth Circuit panel ruled 2-1 that the federal deployment of the National Guard to California in 2025 was illegalAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimA federal court order in the District of Columbia barred the Department of Justice from executing its List Maintenance Project to cull state voter rollsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimNational Democratic organizations and congressional leaders filed a federal lawsuit challenging federal executive actions that interfere with state election administrationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Ninth Circuit held that the unauthorized deployment of state National Guard personnel to execute federal law violated the Tenth AmendmentAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Department of Justice filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the certification of Alaska's election if Democratic candidate Mary Peltola wonAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Democratic election interference lawsuit named Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, Todd Blanche, DHS, and Markwayne Mullin as defendantsAgreeDisagree