Bb5a31f81ClaimFollowing the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the Republican-controlled United States Senate refused to hold hearings or a confirmation vote on President Barack Obama's nominee Merrick GarlandAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimPresident Donald Trump nominated a justice to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Supreme Court seat after Ginsburg died in 2020AgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimAs of November 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether the United States House of Representatives has an affirmative right to enforce subpoenas in courtAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Supreme Court of the United States established that Congress possesses constitutional authority to conduct oversight on any subject upon which legislation may be enactedAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a lawsuit challenging Colorado's exclusion of Catholic preschools from state-funded universal preschoolAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Supreme Court rejected an effort by the Trump administration to force California to set aside ballots from thousands of individuals alleged by the administration to be non-citizensAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimOn November 2, 2026, the US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's attempt to prevent California from counting ballots from more than 20,000 voters suspected of being non-citizensAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell addresses whether the Environmental Protection Agency holds sole authority over chemical safety determinations, preempting state claimsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn the Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell, the United States Department of Justice submitted an amicus brief supporting BayerAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimRepresentative Chellie Pingree, Representative Thomas Massie, and Senator Cory Booker attended a congressional rally at the Supreme Court concerning glyphosate regulationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Carson v. Makin, the Supreme Court invalidated a Maine tuition assistance program that restricted state funding to nonsectarian secondary schoolsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, the Supreme Court ruled that Colorado could not compel a website designer to create websites celebrating same-sex marriagesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017), the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri could not exclude religious schools from a playground resurfacing grant programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex coupleAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimSt. Mary Catholic Parish argued that conditioning participation in Colorado's universal preschool program on compliance with sexual orientation non-discrimination rules violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise ClauseAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the Supreme Court held that Montana could not exclude religious schools from a state tax-credit scholarship programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimJustices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. ComerAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Maxwell v. Dennis, the Supreme Court appointed attorney Brian Barnes as amicus curiae after the federal government supported the petitioner's positionAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimFootnote 3 of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer stated that the ruling addressed express discrimination regarding playground resurfacing rather than religious uses of fundingAgreeDisagree