Bb5a31f81ClaimIn the case Trump v. Mazars, Congress issued subpoenas to obtain President Donald Trump's financial records from Deutsche Bank and Mazars accounting firmAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trump v. Mazars, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress has constitutional authority to issue subpoenas to obtain documents related to the PresidentAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trump v. Mazars, the Supreme Court ruled that a congressional subpoena targeting the President's records must demonstrate a clear legislative purposeAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trump v. Mazars, the Supreme Court held that congressional subpoenas for presidential materials must be narrowly tailored to advance an explicit legislative purposeAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Supreme Court has recognized that judicial review of congressional impeachment rules and procedures is limited by non-justiciability doctrinesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimOn August 31, 2026, the United States Supreme Court granted an emergency stay regarding plaintiffs' standing in litigation contesting Donald Trump's White House ballroom expansion projectAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimJustices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh joined Chief Justice John Roberts's majority opinion in Trump v. MazarsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimChief Justice John Roberts authored the Supreme Court majority opinion in Trump v. MazarsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Water Act have been utilized in litigation to delay or block energy and infrastructure projectsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Supreme Court ruled 8 to 1 to allow the Trump administration to continue border wall construction in West TexasAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe proposed SCOTUS Act would establish a panel of the 13 chief judges of the federal circuit courts or their designees to determine which cases the Supreme Court hearsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimA circuit split among the federal circuit courts of appeals is a primary criterion for the United States Supreme Court to grant certiorariAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimRepresentative Jamie Raskin introduced the SCOTUS Act to reform the case selection process for the Supreme CourtAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe first Trump presidential administration appealed 34 federal district court rulings to the Supreme Court and secured reversals in 25 of those casesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the Supreme Court affirmed the separate-but-equal doctrine, legally entrenching Jim Crow segregationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court struck down Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, effectively incapacitating Section 5 preclearance enforcementAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimRepresentative Jamie Raskin proposed expanding the Supreme Court to 13 justices to provide one justice for each of the 13 federal judicial circuitsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court denied legal citizenship to Black Americans and upheld the institution of chattel slaveryAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Supreme Court is the only court among the 51 supreme courts in the United States that lacks a binding code of judicial ethicsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court rescheduled an argued Voting Rights Act challenge and reframed the question presented into a constitutional issue for a subsequent termAgreeDisagree