Bb5a31f81ClaimThe United States Senate possesses constitutional authority to determine whether to seat its own membersAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Kansas Bill of Rights prohibits imprisonment as a penalty for financial indebtednessAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell addresses whether the Environmental Protection Agency holds sole authority over chemical safety determinations, preempting state claimsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimFederal felony prosecutions under the Fifth Amendment require a grand jury indictment unless the defendant consents to proceed by informationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimBenjamin Wittes and five other plaintiffs filed a federal First Amendment lawsuit challenging the White House's practice of excluding journalists based on unfavorable reportingAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe lawsuit challenging the proposed Washington, D.C. arch asserts an ultra vires cause of action alleging that construction on federal land in the District of Columbia requires congressional approvalAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn the Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell, the United States Department of Justice submitted an amicus brief supporting BayerAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimOn October 30, 2026, Judge Tanya Chutkan held a hearing on a preliminary injunction seeking to halt construction of a proposed monumental arch on federal land in Washington, D.C.AgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimRepresentative Chellie Pingree, Representative Thomas Massie, and Senator Cory Booker attended a congressional rally at the Supreme Court concerning glyphosate regulationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimA federal court in Alabama ruled that warrantless searches conducted by federal agents on construction job sites are illegalAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe lawsuit filed by Benjamin Wittes and fellow plaintiffs asserts a First Amendment right of the public to receive news and information from the White House press corpsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe federal government sued California under the Supremacy Clause, alleging the state facilitated noncitizen voting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 611AgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Carson v. Makin, the Supreme Court invalidated a Maine tuition assistance program that restricted state funding to nonsectarian secondary schoolsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimGuerrero v. Johnson addresses whether an Eighth Amendment intellectual disability claim under Atkins v. Virginia can be asserted after diagnostic standards moved away from strict IQ score cutoffsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017), the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri could not exclude religious schools from a playground resurfacing grant programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex coupleAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimSt. Mary Catholic Parish argued that conditioning participation in Colorado's universal preschool program on compliance with sexual orientation non-discrimination rules violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise ClauseAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the Supreme Court held that Montana could not exclude religious schools from a state tax-credit scholarship programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimState constitutional Blaine amendments originated in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to prohibit the use of public funds for religious schoolsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimJustices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. ComerAgreeDisagree