Former public health director Abdul El-Sayed endorsed implementing a pause on advanced artificial intelligence development

Overview Debates Related claims Topics

Dr. Jaspreet Pannu co-authored a paper in the journal Science proposing a managed access governance framework for dual-use biological data

Leading the Future was established as an artificial intelligence political action committee aimed at resisting federal AI regulations

Joshua Monrad and Janneke Schmidt co-authored a policy proposal for the Institute for Progress titled 'How to Secure the DNA Supply Chain'

International diplomatic hubs including Geneva, Beijing, and Singapore have a limited number of diplomatic personnel focused on biotechnology governance and biosecurity

Joshua Monrad supports enacting a temporary pause on frontier AI biological model training until comprehensive societal biodefenses and supply chain safeguards are operational

Noblis CIO Mark Ley uses a delegation framework that evaluates artificial intelligence systems based on expected reward and risk of error

The International Mission Board's AI charter prohibits giving artificial intelligence autonomous authority in high-risk and high-stakes contexts

The International Mission Board requires human-in-the-loop oversight whenever artificial intelligence is used to generate code

Don Barger and an eight-person team at the International Mission Board established an organizational artificial intelligence charter before writing software code

The International Mission Board's AI policy prohibits artificial intelligence from making final autonomous decisions about people

California State Senator Scott Wiener served as the lead sponsor for California Senate Bill 1047, proposed in 2024

Anthropic imposed operational red lines prohibiting the United States military from utilizing its artificial intelligence models for mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weaponry

Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez proposed 20-year prison terms for developers of superintelligent artificial intelligence systems

Under the RAND Corporation's strategic taxonomy, the co-development archetype involves a consortium pooling compute and establishing layered verification, which risks making non-democratic founding values the default

The RAND Corporation compiled a Security Architecture Catalog detailing 106 distinct technical and institutional capabilities required to support strategic freedom of action regarding artificial general intelligence

The RAND Corporation report 'A U.S. Strategy to Secure Geopolitical Advantage on an Uncertain Path to Superintelligence' identifies seven strategic archetypes: acceleration, dominance, co-development, preparedness for coexistence, moratorium, deterrence, and continuity of society

Under the RAND Corporation's strategic taxonomy, the deterrence archetype involves halting domestic frontier AI while suppressing rival programs through force if necessary

The RAND Corporation report 'A U.S. Strategy to Secure Geopolitical Advantage on an Uncertain Path to Superintelligence' defines five pivotal uncertainties: proximity to dangerous AI, feasibility of coexistence, feasibility of restraint, reachability of decisive strategic advantage, and feasibility of suppression

Under the RAND Corporation's strategic taxonomy, the dominance archetype involves leading at the frontier and suppressing rivals, risking extreme power concentration and value lock-in

Under the RAND Corporation's strategic taxonomy, the moratorium archetype seeks a verifiable global halt to frontier AI progress, risking the emergence of an intrusive global surveillance regime for enforcement