Bb5a31f81ClaimFederal policy initiatives that require funding must receive approval through the White House Office of Management and BudgetAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell addresses whether the Environmental Protection Agency holds sole authority over chemical safety determinations, preempting state claimsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimFederal felony prosecutions under the Fifth Amendment require a grand jury indictment unless the defendant consents to proceed by informationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimBenjamin Wittes and five other plaintiffs filed a federal First Amendment lawsuit challenging the White House's practice of excluding journalists based on unfavorable reportingAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimPresident Barack Obama appointed former Monsanto attorney Michael Taylor to lead the food safety division at the Food and Drug AdministrationAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimDuring a meeting in Washington, D.C., an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official told the South Texas Builders Association board that un-enclosed construction sites are not considered private propertyAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn the Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell, the United States Department of Justice submitted an amicus brief supporting BayerAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimOn October 30, 2026, Judge Tanya Chutkan held a hearing on a preliminary injunction seeking to halt construction of a proposed monumental arch on federal land in Washington, D.C.AgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimA federal court in Alabama ruled that warrantless searches conducted by federal agents on construction job sites are illegalAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe lawsuit filed by Benjamin Wittes and fellow plaintiffs asserts a First Amendment right of the public to receive news and information from the White House press corpsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimThe federal government sued California under the Supremacy Clause, alleging the state facilitated noncitizen voting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 611AgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimUnited States Cabinet secretaries serve at the pleasure of the President of the United StatesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Carson v. Makin, the Supreme Court invalidated a Maine tuition assistance program that restricted state funding to nonsectarian secondary schoolsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimGuerrero v. Johnson addresses whether an Eighth Amendment intellectual disability claim under Atkins v. Virginia can be asserted after diagnostic standards moved away from strict IQ score cutoffsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, the Supreme Court ruled that Colorado could not compel a website designer to create websites celebrating same-sex marriagesAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017), the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri could not exclude religious schools from a playground resurfacing grant programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimSt. Mary Catholic Parish argued that conditioning participation in Colorado's universal preschool program on compliance with sexual orientation non-discrimination rules violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise ClauseAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimIn Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, the Supreme Court held that Montana could not exclude religious schools from a state tax-credit scholarship programAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimState constitutional Blaine amendments originated in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to prohibit the use of public funds for religious schoolsAgreeDisagree
Bb5a31f81ClaimJustices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. ComerAgreeDisagree