889bd89bfClaimNATO members should defend attacked allies even at risk of war with a nuclear powerAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO members should pool control of regional drone-defence systems rather than operate separate national networksAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO should jointly finance drone-defence coverage for its Black Sea coastal membersAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe United States has played a leading role in NATO's defense since 1949, providing nuclear deterrence, military forces, intelligence, and strategic capabilitiesAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO Secretary General Mark Rutte supports greater European responsibility for conventional defense while maintaining the United States as a central security partnerAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO members committed in 2025 to invest 5% of GDP annually in defense and security-related spending by 2035, increasing pressure to redistribute military responsibilitiesAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimSupporters of continued American leadership argue that U.S. nuclear deterrence and advanced military capabilities remain essential to NATO's credibilityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimArticle 5 of NATO's founding treaty requires members to assist an ally facing an armed attack, although each country determines what action to takeAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimPoland and the Baltic states place particular importance on maintaining a credible American military presence and security guarantees to deter Russian aggressionAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO's major decisions are made by consensus among all 32 members, regardless of their military spending or sizeAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO's threats of overwhelming retaliation increase the risk of escalation with RussiaAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO governments should prioritise European suppliers when funding critical defence technologiesAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO governments should prioritise counter-drone capabilities over additional conventional weapons platformsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO should promise overwhelming military retaliation against attacks on allied territoryAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO should treat state-directed sabotage as grounds for collective defenceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimSecurity guarantees for Ukraine should include binding military commitmentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimHosting nuclear weapons would strengthen NATO's deterrence on its eastern flankAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNATO should reject Russia's use of nuclear threats to constrain allied decisionsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimRussia's nuclear warning over Kaliningrad is an attempt to deter NATO rather than evidence of an imminent attackAgreeDisagree