Canceling offshore-wind leases without new public rulemaking weakens the legitimacy of federal energy policy

Overview Debates Related claims Topics

Russian diesel should be treated as sanctions relief rather than ordinary energy trade

Darline Graham should oppose Trump’s Iran policy when it threatens South Carolina energy prices

Federal limits on data centers would protect South Carolina consumers from rising electricity costs

Data-center electricity costs give Brown a credible local challenge to Husted

Data-center expansion should be central to Ohio’s Senate campaign because it will shape electricity costs

Boulder’s climate lawsuit would raise energy costs for Colorado consumers

Energy companies should face liability for emissions produced before climate risks became widely known

Local climate lawsuits would expose energy companies to worldwide damages

Allowing Boulder’s lawsuit would increase uncertainty for national energy companies

Congress should limit the president's power to revoke approved energy permits

Jon Husted’s data-center support makes him accountable for Ohio’s electricity burden

Ohio data centers threaten household electricity affordability

Early energy normalization would reward Russia before Ukraine receives enforceable security guarantees

Lowering fuel economy standards will boost American automotive manufacturing jobs

Federal climate rollbacks shift transition costs toward California taxpayers and energy consumers

Diesel-export restrictions would invite foreign retaliation against American energy producers

Offshore wind support expands America’s energy options at a cost taxpayers must bear

Federal climate rollbacks would make offshore wind less competitive against established energy sources

Democratic divisions over the data-center bill weaken Chuck Schumer’s leverage over household electricity costs

California’s litigation is justified because federal climate rollbacks directly affect the state’s energy choices