Cc9f267dcClaimApproximately 87.1% of the QU tokens drained in the October 18, 2026 wallet drain remain immobilized directly on the Qubic network on-chainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCryptocurrency exchange MEXC froze the receiving account holding 12.9% of the drained QU tokens within one hour of the October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimQubic developers prepared for a mainnet restart utilizing the patched client version 4.26.4 following the October 18, 2026 wallet drainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe August 2026 Vottun Bridge exploit exposed operational risks tied to outer components, including the Vottun Bridge, of the Qubic networkAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimQubic developers released client version 4.26.4 to fix the October 18, 2026 seed-generation vulnerability and secured additional funds also exposed to that vulnerability prior to theftAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimIn August 2026, the Vottun Bridge linked to the Qubic network was exploited in a security incident separate from Qubic's October 18, 2026 wallet drainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimDecentralized AI computing network Qubic halted its mainnet on October 18, 2026, after an attacker drained 1,404 user walletsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimQubic network validators halted mainnet operations at tick 85,371,949 to lock the ledger in place following the October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCryptocurrency exchange Bitget suspended all QUBIC token deposits and withdrawals as a precaution following the October 18, 2026 mainnet haltAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drain resulted in the theft of approximately 2.94 trillion native QU tokens valued at roughly $1.3 millionAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drain did not affect QEARN, the Qubic network's staking featureAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimQubic developers stated that the October 18, 2026 wallet drain stemmed from weak, predictable wallet seeds created on legacy Apple devices, Safari browsers, and early iOS applications rather than a core network code bugAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimDeciding whether to compensate victims of the October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drain rests with Qubic's Computor cluster, the group of network operators who vote on governance decisionsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimRestoring QUBIC token deposits and withdrawals on Bitget and managing frozen assets on MEXC remain pending resolution following the October 18, 2026 Qubic wallet drainAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe Qubic wallet drain on October 18, 2026 lasted 104 minutes, running from 23:42 UTC on October 17, 2026, to 01:26 UTC on October 18, 2026AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCysic blacklisted the recipient address of the unauthorized 10 million CYS mint at 13:47:52 UTC on October 17, 2026, freezing approximately 2.8 million tokensAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCysic brought in third-party security experts to investigate the October 17, 2026 bridge breach involving the unauthorized CYS mint and track the movement and potential swapping of the exploited CYS tokensAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCysic reported no impact on its CGT governance token from the October 17, 2026 bridge exploit affecting CYS tokensAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCysic indefinitely suspended its cross-chain bridge on October 17, 2026 following an unauthorized CYS token mint, providing no timeline for its returnAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCysic described the October 17, 2026 bridge incident involving the unauthorized CYS mint as limited to bridge message processing and token minting, with its mainnet and other operational systems remaining unaffectedAgreeDisagree
