Cc9f267dcClaimStarkWare demonstrated a Private Know Your Customer system on June 23, 2026, using zero-knowledge proofs on mobile devices to verify identity criteria without exposing full passport documents.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimStarkWare announced the launch of Shadow Accounts on October 13, 2026, allowing decentralized finance users to create persistent, application-specific identities without exposing links to their primary crypto wallets.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimStarkWare introduced its STRK20 privacy framework on June 9, 2026, providing zero-knowledge shielded balances, private transfers, and viewing keys for auditing ERC-20 assets on Starknet.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimStarkWare launched OffMarket, a privacy service that enables users to trade on Polymarket without publicly linking their trading positions to their primary accounts.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimFinancial Privacy Inc. holds OffMarket's master viewing key in a secure enclave under a multisignature arrangement with StarkWare, screening deposits against sanctions and reviewing legal requests for transaction data.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimWhen withdrawing from a Starknet Shadow Account, funds return to shielded STRK20 balances using zero-knowledge proofs managed by the wallet.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimStarknet Shadow Accounts allow users to manage decentralized finance positions without publicly linking their application activity to primary cryptocurrency wallets.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimOffMarket cannot mask public transaction sizes, order prices, execution timing, or public USDC pool transfers, which can potentially expose trader identities during low liquidity periods.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimStarknet Shadow Accounts hold public ERC-20 tokens, allowing blockchain observers to examine transaction histories once a specific Shadow Account address is identified.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimUsers fund Starknet Shadow Accounts by depositing supported assets into a shared privacy pool represented through encrypted STRK20 balances.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimShadow Account balances and transactions remain publicly visible on the blockchain, but the connection to the user's primary wallet address is obscured.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe Pirate Chain development team proposed a blockchain rollback to revert the network to its state as of 20:00 UTC on October 14, 2026, discarding all subsequent blocksAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimPirate Chain targets a maximum total supply ceiling of 200 million ARRR tokensAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimA source code flaw in the Pirate Chain privacy network allowed an unauthorized user to mint approximately 39.8 million ARRR tokens on October 14, 2026AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimPirate Chain enforces mandatory zk-SNARKs privacy shielding across 100% of its network transactionsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe unauthorized minting of 39.8 million ARRR tokens represented roughly 20% of the total Pirate Chain token supply at the time of the October 14, 2026 exploitAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimFollowing the unauthorized minting of 39.8 million ARRR tokens on October 14, 2026, the illicit tokens were rapidly moved into Pirate Chain's Sapling shielded poolAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe Pirate Chain network remained operational while developers worked on recovery, instructed wallet users not to move funds, and requested exchanges and mining pools voluntarily pause operations following the October 14, 2026 exploit that minted 39.8 million ARRR tokensAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimOnchain researchers linked tampered Ledger hardware wallets distributed by Malaysian reseller CryptoBilis in Southeast Asia to suspected cryptocurrency losses ranging between $86 million and $93.2 million across over 300 walletsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimUnauthorized implants inside compromised CryptoBilis devices captured users' 24-word recovery phrases from screens during setup and transmitted them over mobile networks using hidden chipsAgreeDisagree