Cc9f267dcNews eventClaimNEAR Protocol's House of Stake voted to approve proposal HSP-029, lowering the network's maximum annual token issuance from 2.5% to 1.6%AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe implementation of NEAR Protocol's lower issuance cap begins with a roughly 90-day grace period following ratification by NEAR Protocol's Security Council and validator protocol upgrade adoptionAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimSVRN CEO Sal Ternullo said NEAR Protocol staking yields are expected to fall from approximately 5.27% gross to 3.37% as new token emissions decreaseAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimNEAR Protocol's existing 2.5% annual issuance cap remains active until NEAR Protocol's Security Council ratifies proposal HSP-029 and network validators adopt the required upgradeAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimFollowing the 90-day grace period under proposal HSP-029, NEAR Protocol will gradually step down token issuance over a 24-month transition period until reaching the final 1.6% maximum capAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimModeling indicates NEAR Protocol will issue about 11.8 million fewer NEAR tokens over two years and 66 million fewer over six years under the 1.6% cap set by proposal HSP-029AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe approval of proposal HSP-029 marks the second time NEAR Protocol has lowered its token issuance ceiling, following an initial reduction from 5% to 2.5% in late October 2025AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimUnder proposal HSP-029, daily token issuance on NEAR Protocol is projected to decrease from approximately 89,500 NEAR per day to around 57,300 NEAR at full implementationAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimProposal HSP-029 aims to continue NEAR Protocol's monetary policy shift in a phased manner rather than through an abrupt economic shock to stakers and non-stakersAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimLowering NEAR Protocol's issuance ceiling is designed to reduce token dilution for passive holders who do not earn staking rewardsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCoinbase Chief Legal Officer Molly Abraham stated that New Jersey users missed millions of dollars in staking rewards over three years, while Coinbase previously estimated those missed state rewards at over $15 millionAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimIn its October 29, 2026 quarterly filing, Coinbase warned that losing its remaining state-level enforcement cases in California, Maryland, Wisconsin, and Washington could materially hurt its businessAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission agreed in February 2025 to drop its federal lawsuit against Coinbase regarding the exchange's crypto staking serviceAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimState securities regulators in Alabama, Illinois, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Vermont dropped their respective regulatory actions against Coinbase's staking service during 2025AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCalifornia led a ten-state regulatory task force behind the 2023 staking enforcement actions against Coinbase, which affected over 600,000 accounts held by California residentsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCoinbase Chief Executive Officer Brian Armstrong stated that New Jersey users will regain access to Coinbase's crypto staking service very soon following the state's October 30, 2026 order rescissionAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimIn May 2025, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued non-binding guidance stating that protocol staking generally does not involve securities, though Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw publicly dissented from that positionAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimIn June 2023, 145,270 New Jersey residents were using Coinbase's staking service when the New Jersey Bureau of Securities alleged that the service constituted an unregistered securityAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimCalifornia, Maryland, and Wisconsin continue to enforce agreements barring Coinbase from offering new staking services, while Washington state maintains an active regulatory enforcement action seeking a $4 million fineAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimIn April 2025, Coinbase estimated that its users across multiple U.S. states had missed out on $90 million in staking rewards due to state-level regulatory restrictionsAgreeDisagree