Cc9f267dcClaimSolana core engineering firm Anza developed the Alpenglow upgrade and took the protocol from a white paper to mainnet deployment in under 18 monthsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimAlpenglow is designed to continue operating with up to 20% of stake acting maliciously and another 20% offlineAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimAlpenglow condenses Solana's previous two-step transaction confirmation process under TowerBFT into a single step for finalityAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimMoving validator votes off-chain under Alpenglow is expected to reduce Solana's reported transaction counts and TPS because vote transactions are no longer included in blocksAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimUnder Alpenglow's Votor mechanism on Solana, validators send BLS-signed vote messages directly off-chain rather than submitting votes as block transactionsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimFollowing Alpenglow, developers at Jump Crypto proposed removing Solana's 60 million compute-unit block limit to let block size scale with validator hardwareAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimSolana activated its Alpenglow consensus upgrade on mainnet-beta on October 21, 2026, replacing TowerBFT at slot 459,653,000AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe Alpenglow upgrade reduces Solana's transaction finality from about 12.8 seconds to roughly 150 millisecondsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimDuring public testnet and devnet testing, Alpenglow achieved median finality times as low as 54 millisecondsAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimAlpenglow on Solana can finalize a block in one round if 80% of stake votes for it, or in two rounds requiring 60% of stake per roundAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimUnder Solana's Alpenglow upgrade, validators pay a flat 0.8 SOL per epoch fee rather than paying per-vote transaction feesAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimBalaji Srinivasan proposed requiring blockchain users to consent in advance to network state rollbacks if a cryptographic signature scheme is brokenAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimHaseeb Qureshi proposed deploying a validator kill switch that forces blockchain addresses into cryptographic recovery mode without requiring hard fork upgradesAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimTokenLogic submitted an October 15, 2026 governance proposal to introduce a permissioned GHO Stability Module for USAT on Aave V4 on Avalanche.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimAn amendment to XRP Ledger rules, such as fixCleanup3_4_0, requires continuous approval from over 80% of the network's 35 default trusted validators—at least 29 votes—for two consecutive weeks before activatingAgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimRipple's proposed LendingProtocol amendment (XLS-66) held 19 of 35 validator votes as of October 19, 2026, leaving it 10 votes short of the 29 needed for activation.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment closes a loophole that could allow account roles authorized only to burn tokens to create new tokens under specific conditions.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe XRP Ledger SingleAssetVault amendment (XLS-65), designed to store deposited assets for lending, held 21 validator votes as of October 19, 2026, leaving it eight votes short of approval.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimThe XRP Ledger fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment reached 29 validator votes on October 9, 2026, and held 29 on October 19, 2026, tracking activation around 09:34 UTC on October 23, 2026, with a single validator withdrawal restarting its 14-day countdown.AgreeDisagree
Cc9f267dcClaimEven if the LendingProtocol proposal reached 29 validator votes immediately, the required two-week voting period prevents the lending feature from activating before early November 2026.AgreeDisagree