On protein design benchmarks, Mythos 5.2 scored 85.1%, outperforming Mythos 5.1 by 6 percentage points

Overview Debates Related claims Topics

On the Artificial Analysis benchmark suite, Fable 5.2 cost $26.54 per task when operating on max effort settings

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Fable 5.2 achieved a score of 65, placing 5 points ahead of Gemini Carbon, 6 points ahead of Opus 5.5, and 8 points ahead of GPT-6 Astra

On the RoboDojo Simon robotics benchmark, Fable 5.2 scored 64.9%, exceeding Opus 5.5's score by 25 points

On the Remote Labor Index contractor benchmark, Fable 5.2 achieved a score of 41.3%, compared to Opus 5.5's score of 21%

On the Artificial Analysis benchmark suite, Fable 5.2 cost $9.08 per task on high effort settings

Ablating 80% to 90% of neurons in the Qwen 3.6-35B A3B language model improved performance on ARC-AGI benchmark puzzles

On the TerminalBench Science 0.1 benchmark for agentic scientific research, Fable 5.2 scored 6 points ahead of GPT-6 Astra

On the Artificial Analysis benchmark suite, Fable 5.2 cost $14.83 per task on extra high effort settings

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Fable 5.2 scored 62 on both the Extra High and High effort settings

On the AA Briefcase benchmark, Fable 5.2 recorded a lower Elo score than Opus 5.5

Performance on factual question-answering benchmarks such as MedQA and GPQA Diamond can be restored to within one point of baseline after model sparsification and fine-tuning

On the AA Briefcase agentic knowledge work benchmark, Fable 5.2 scored approximately 5 points higher than Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, and Gemini 4 Carbon

On the FrontierCode coding benchmark, Fable 5.2 scored 4 points ahead of GPT-6 Astra and 3.5 points ahead of Opus 5.5

PresentBench is a public benchmark comprising 200 tasks evaluating slide-related and presentation-related generation capabilities

Canva Craft achieved a fourth-place ranking on the Design Arena benchmark upon Canva's initial submission

The Google DeepMind AlphaFold model uses neural networks combined with biological domain knowledge to predict the 3D structures of folded proteins from amino acid sequences

Handshake AI developed the VIALS benchmark to evaluate the capability of AI models to interpret life science laboratory assays

The VIALS benchmark evaluates model interpretation on tasks including plasmid DNA sequence percentages, molecular hydrogen bond counts, and medical histology images

Handshake AI developed the ATLAS finance benchmark, comprising 100 tasks evaluated across 13 simulated financial environments

Frontier models including MiniMax, GLM, and Grok score below a 20 percent pass rate on the VIALS benchmark