Climate negotiations should proceed on existing scientific evidence without waiting for the next IPCC assessment

Overview Debates Related claims Topics

High-income countries should compensate low-income countries for irreversible climate damage

Countries should impose carbon tariffs on imports from countries with weaker emissions rules

Solar geoengineering should require international approval

Developing countries should be allowed to increase fossil-fuel use to reduce poverty

Climate-related displacement should create a right to international protection

The IPCC should complete its principal assessments before the 2028 global climate stocktake

Governments' control over approval of IPCC reports compromises scientific independence

Wealthy countries should fund developing-country researchers' participation in IPCC assessments

Wealthy countries should prioritise grant-based climate finance for vulnerable Pacific states

Non-binding climate declarations are inadequate without enforceable national commitments

Pacific island states should have greater influence over international climate negotiations

Governments should ban private jets

Nuclear power is essential to solving climate change

Frequent flyers should pay a climate tax

Environmental protection should come before economic development

Climate activists do more harm than good

Individual lifestyle changes are pointless in fighting climate change

Economic growth is more important than fighting climate change

People should be legally required to reduce their carbon footprint

Communities should be able to reject planned relocation even when governments judge staying unsafe