889bd89bfClaimThe United States should require AI companies to report serious safety and security incidentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimAn intelligence-led AI task force places too much emphasis on national security over public accountabilityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimExisting US consumer-protection law is sufficient to address risks from autonomous AI agentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimExcluding advanced technology from trade negotiations is necessary to protect U.S. national securityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should require independent security testing before autonomous AI agents receive external-system accessAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe FCC should expand its blacklist to cover all information and communications technologyAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimRequiring interagency approval before blacklisting foreign technology weakens US national securityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimInvestigating anti-data-center nonprofits for foreign funding is a justified national security measureAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimRetroactively revoking authorizations for blacklisted foreign technology does more harm than goodAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe federal government should establish a centralized database to verify voter citizenshipAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimConsolidating citizen records into the SAVE database violates federal privacy rightsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNational security concerns justify a total ban on Chinese connected vehiclesAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe Australian intrusion demonstrates that voluntary AI-safety controls are inadequateAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimWarnings about existential AI risks should not distract governments from present-day cybersecurity harmsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimA U.S.–China AI incident line would reduce the risk of accidental confrontation between the two countriesAgreeDisagree