889bd89bfClaimThe United States and Iran should separate fertiliser-transit arrangements from nuclear negotiationsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe United States should recognise Iran's right to enrich uranium under a peace agreementAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimIran should substantially reduce its enrichment capacity as a condition for ending the warAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimA settlement based on limits to enrichment is preferable to demanding that Iran abandon enrichment entirelyAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimIran should restore international nuclear inspections as a condition of sanctions reliefAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimIt is unclear if sufficient leverage exists to effectively pressure North KoreaAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimA country's nuclear capability is a significant bargaining chip, making a pre-negotiation demand for denuclearization unrealisticAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe North Korean government is currently much more stable than the governments of Libya or Syria were during their respective negotiationsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe North Korean government supports non-nuclear actors and human rights offendersAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimRequiring North Korea to commit to denuclearization as a precondition for talks is unrealisticAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimApplying pressure on North Korea before negotiations could be an effective strategyAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe negotiation strategies used with Libya or Syria would not be effective with North Korea at presentAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimNegotiations with North Korea are difficult without agreed-upon terms of referenceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThere is a lack of parity between the powers involved in negotiations with North KoreaAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimA demand for denuclearization raises the question of whether the U.S. would also be expected to denuclearizeAgreeDisagree