The more justice is at stake, the less inclined one should be to pursue peace

Joining the International Criminal Court would require the United States to give up its sovereignty to follow the institution's decisions

889bd89bfClaim

All member countries of the International Criminal Court, not just the United States, must face controversial decisions from the court

889bd89bfClaim

U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC) could improve diplomacy, particularly concerning humanitarian assistance and at the United Nations

889bd89bfClaim

All countries, not just the United States, have to face controversial decisions from the International Criminal Court

889bd89bfClaim

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has made controversial decisions in recent years that show potential political bias

889bd89bfClaim

There is no reason for the United States to cede its own judicial system to an international body

889bd89bfClaim

Joining the International Criminal Court (ICC) means the United States would have to undertake certain obligations

889bd89bfClaim

Countries should grant citizenship to everyone born there regardless of parents’ immigration status

889bd89bfClaim

Countries should renounce nuclear first use

889bd89bfClaim

Ukraine should have a decisive role in negotiations concerning the release of frozen Russian assets

889bd89bfClaim

Limited access to frozen assets is a justified incentive for Russian participation in peace negotiations

889bd89bfClaim

Frozen Russian sovereign assets should remain immobilised until Moscow agrees to compensate Ukraine

889bd89bfClaim

Ukraine giving up its land and right to self-determination for the sake of peace would undermine justice

889bd89bfClaim

Ukraine must continue fighting to reclaim its land from Russia

889bd89bfClaim

Peace should be pursued in the Russia-Ukraine war because Ukraine is an independent state

889bd89bfClaim

NATO's traditional role is to keep Europe away from Russia

889bd89bfClaim

The more justice is at stake, the less inclined one should be to pursue peace

Israel and Palestine should pursue a negotiated two-state solution

Ukraine should continue striking Russian energy infrastructure despite US pressure

An international court is not a necessary institution

Joining the International Criminal Court would require the United States to give up its sovereignty to follow the institution's decisions

All member countries of the International Criminal Court, not just the United States, must face controversial decisions from the court

U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC) could improve diplomacy, particularly concerning humanitarian assistance and at the United Nations

All countries, not just the United States, have to face controversial decisions from the International Criminal Court

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has made controversial decisions in recent years that show potential political bias

There is no reason for the United States to cede its own judicial system to an international body

Joining the International Criminal Court (ICC) means the United States would have to undertake certain obligations

Countries should grant citizenship to everyone born there regardless of parents’ immigration status

Countries should renounce nuclear first use

Ukraine should have a decisive role in negotiations concerning the release of frozen Russian assets

Limited access to frozen assets is a justified incentive for Russian participation in peace negotiations

Frozen Russian sovereign assets should remain immobilised until Moscow agrees to compensate Ukraine

Ukraine giving up its land and right to self-determination for the sake of peace would undermine justice

Ukraine must continue fighting to reclaim its land from Russia

Peace should be pursued in the Russia-Ukraine war because Ukraine is an independent state

NATO's traditional role is to keep Europe away from Russia

Russia's true intentions in the war against Ukraine are to gain power, spread terrorism, and defeat NATO and liberalism