889bd89bfClaimThe United States should require AI companies to report serious safety and security incidentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimAn intelligence-led AI task force places too much emphasis on national security over public accountabilityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimExisting US consumer-protection law is sufficient to address risks from autonomous AI agentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should require independent security testing before autonomous AI agents receive external-system accessAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe Australian intrusion demonstrates that voluntary AI-safety controls are inadequateAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimFrontier-AI companies cannot be trusted to regulate their own security risksAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe UN Security Council should establish a permanent process for assessing frontier-AI security risksAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimInternational cooperation on frontier AI is necessary to prevent loss-of-control incidentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe United States and China should establish a bilateral AI-incident notification mechanismAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimA U.S.–China AI incident line would reduce the risk of accidental confrontation between the two countriesAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe US should slow down advanced AI, even if it risks losing ground to ChinaAgreeDisagree66
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should establish a single set of global standards to regulate artificial intelligenceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe UK can broker a global agreement on artificial intelligence governanceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should restrict artificial intelligence development to prevent existential risksAgreeDisagree