889bd89bfClaimThe United States should require AI companies to report serious safety and security incidentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimAn intelligence-led AI task force places too much emphasis on national security over public accountabilityAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimExisting US consumer-protection law is sufficient to address risks from autonomous AI agentsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should require independent security testing before autonomous AI agents receive external-system accessAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe Australian intrusion demonstrates that voluntary AI-safety controls are inadequateAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimWarnings about existential AI risks should not distract governments from present-day cybersecurity harmsAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe U.S.–China AI incident mechanism should cover military systems and critical national infrastructureAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe US should slow down advanced AI, even if it risks losing ground to ChinaAgreeDisagree66
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should establish a single set of global standards to regulate artificial intelligenceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe UK can broker a global agreement on artificial intelligence governanceAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimGovernments should restrict artificial intelligence development to prevent existential risksAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimThe US should include chip export controls in AI safety negotiations with ChinaAgreeDisagree
889bd89bfClaimLeading AI companies should be required to report national-security incidents to their governmentsAgreeDisagree