Parents should not be allowed to select embryos for predicted intelligence

Debate continues over whether parents not be allowed to select embryos for predicted in....

It is uncertain whether the outcomes of selecting embryos for intelligence will ultimately outweigh the costs

552c7ae14Claim

The possibility of unintended consequences is not a sufficient reason to ban an action, as this principle would prevent any new developments

552c7ae14Claim

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence will not necessarily change the total number of smart people

552c7ae14Claim

The risk of unintended consequences from a new technology calls for caution, strong initial regulations, and a gradual approach rather than a complete ban

552c7ae14Claim

The power to select embryos for predicted intelligence is likely to be abused and overused by those in positions of authority

552c7ae14Claim

Selecting embryos to prevent diseases, such as sickle cell anemia, is acceptable

552c7ae14Claim

The risk of unintended consequences is not a sufficient reason on its own to completely ban a new technology

552c7ae14Claim

Embryos selected for predicted intelligence will still need to be nurtured and raised to become good and intelligent people

552c7ae14Claim

Increasing the number of intelligent people accelerates societal progress, which is a reason to allow embryo selection for intelligence

552c7ae14Claim

An increase in the number of intelligent people accelerates societal progress, leading to more beneficial products and connections

552c7ae14Claim

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence is a slippery slope that will have unintended consequences

552c7ae14Claim

Increasing the general intelligence of a society is desirable if it can be done slowly, correctly, and carefully

552c7ae14Claim

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence discredits people who became geniuses without being predicted to do so

552c7ae14Claim

It is possible to select embryos that have the likeliest chance to be more intelligent

552c7ae14Claim

Focusing on educating the current population is a viable alternative for producing the geniuses society is looking for

552c7ae14Claim

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence disregards the transformative role of nurture in a person's development

552c7ae14Claim

Instead of a ban, the risks of embryo selection for intelligence should be managed with strong regulations and a gradual, step-by-step approach

552c7ae14Claim

Parents should not be allowed to select embryos for predicted intelligence

Younger patients should receive priority when lifesaving treatment is scarce

Doctors should be allowed to prescribe undisclosed placebos when no effective treatment exists

It is uncertain whether the outcomes of selecting embryos for intelligence will ultimately outweigh the costs

The possibility of unintended consequences is not a sufficient reason to ban an action, as this principle would prevent any new developments

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence will not necessarily change the total number of smart people

The risk of unintended consequences from a new technology calls for caution, strong initial regulations, and a gradual approach rather than a complete ban

The power to select embryos for predicted intelligence is likely to be abused and overused by those in positions of authority

Selecting embryos to prevent diseases, such as sickle cell anemia, is acceptable

The risk of unintended consequences is not a sufficient reason on its own to completely ban a new technology

Embryos selected for predicted intelligence will still need to be nurtured and raised to become good and intelligent people

Increasing the number of intelligent people accelerates societal progress, which is a reason to allow embryo selection for intelligence

An increase in the number of intelligent people accelerates societal progress, leading to more beneficial products and connections

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence is a slippery slope that will have unintended consequences

Increasing the general intelligence of a society is desirable if it can be done slowly, correctly, and carefully

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence discredits people who became geniuses without being predicted to do so

It is possible to select embryos that have the likeliest chance to be more intelligent

Focusing on educating the current population is a viable alternative for producing the geniuses society is looking for

Selecting embryos for predicted intelligence disregards the transformative role of nurture in a person's development

Instead of a ban, the risks of embryo selection for intelligence should be managed with strong regulations and a gradual, step-by-step approach

The unintended consequences of selecting embryos for intelligence may only become apparent 5, 10, 15, or 100 years later