The Senate Judiciary Committee is an appropriate venue for investigating presidential-family business conflicts

Overview Debates Related claims Topics

Elite schools kept using race in admissions after the U.S. Supreme Court banned it

Congress should expand the Supreme Court beyond nine justices

Federal judges should not impose nationwide bans on Trump administration advertisements

The federal judge’s order makes pretrial bans on presidential advertisements easier to obtain

Blocking taxpayer-funded presidential advertisements without proving electoral intent exceeds federal judicial authority

The Supreme Court should leave political advertising rates to the FCC

FCC control of political advertising rates protects campaigns from judicially imposed price increases

Judicial skepticism toward the White House’s rationale strengthens review of press access

Supreme Court intervention is necessary to prevent FCC rates from reshaping midterm competition

Supreme Court justices should time their retirements to align with a favorable political landscape

The Supreme Court operates as a political institution rather than an independent judiciary

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to review Colorado’s climate damages ruling

A federal judge should not be able to restore a prison union contract after the president ends collective bargaining rights

The Supreme Court was justified in lifting the stay on Christa Pike's execution

Federal judges bear responsibility for the constitutional conflict created by Roger Rogoff’s appointment

Supreme Court justices owe no deference to Trump in cases involving his administration

Presidential criticism of Supreme Court rulings is legitimate when judicial decisions reshape national elections

Supreme Court justices should be required to publicly explain their recusal decisions

Federal judges should stay out of public political fights

The BOP injunction strengthens judicial limits on executive orders over federal labor rights