441e85161ClaimSubject matter experts, such as engineers, should be included in AI decision-making tablesAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimThe long-term consequences of developing powerful AI technology are unknownAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimAI development should be slowed to allow regulations to be created with agreement between large tech companies and governmentsAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimThe power of AI technology and the uncertainty of its consequences necessitate a focus on public safetyAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimCurrent AI development is irresponsible because it lacks sufficient regulation to ensure safetyAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimSubject matter experts and engineers should be at the decision-making table to explain the technical aspects of AI to public policy professionalsAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimSociety needs to understand and adapt to powerful AI technologies to ensure public safetyAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimSlowing down AI development is not realistic as the tech sector will not stop making AI evolveAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimSlowing down AI development would decrease the United States' geopolitical competitiveness and its influence in cybersecurityAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimAI development should be slowed down in specific application areas, not just in core LLM developmentAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimAI development should be slowed down holistically, including not just core large language models but also their applicationsAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimThe AI development race is continuing despite the existence of warning signs about its dangersAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimContinued AI development is necessary for foreign policy and cybersecurityAgreeDisagree
441e85161ClaimIt will be impossible to implement safeguards for or detect deception from an AI that becomes smarter than humansAgreeDisagree