Legal experts argued that Meta Platforms' removal of explicit training language from its updated business terms failed to rule out potential content scraping for artificial intelligence services

Overview Debates Related claims Topics Sources

Publishers and digital advertisers argued that Meta Platforms' proposed commercial terms would grant the company an unlimited right to exploit site content and archives for artificial intelligence training

Global publishers are increasingly challenging artificial intelligence developers using copyrighted material without permission for large language model training under fair-use arguments

Digital advertisers and publishing groups in the European Union and the United Kingdom filed complaints urging antitrust regulators to suspend Meta Platforms' new Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms pending investigation

The European Commission welcomed Meta Platforms' decision to delay its updated Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms while issuing requests for information to companies lacking published summaries on AI training data

Meta Platforms postponed the effective date of its updated Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms from October 30, 2026, to November 20, 2026

European Publishers Council Executive Director Angela Mills Wade stated that maintaining a business page or advertising should not confer general AI training rights over a publisher's website

Meta Platforms spokesperson Daniel Roberts stated the enforcement delay of its Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms provides time to explain changes regarding platform content usage to partners and stakeholders

Meta Platforms stated it will clarify how its web crawlers operate and affirm that content owners can use robots.txt files to set crawling preferences

Meta Platforms rejected claims from publishers that its updated Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms authorize unauthorized content scraping for artificial intelligence models

The News/Media Alliance sent a letter to Meta Platforms Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg on October 22, 2026, demanding revisions to its proposed business terms, the Commercial Terms and Self-Serve Ad Terms, to prevent severe publisher harm

Fast Company first reported that Meta Platforms faced publisher pushback over commercial terms that appeared to allow unpermitted web scraping of host platforms

Attorneys from Freedman Normand Friedland LLP and Stris & Maher LLP plan to file individual copyright lawsuits against Meta Platforms Inc. on behalf of up to 1,000 additional authors.

The lawsuits filed against Meta Platforms Inc. on October 19, 2026, were brought as individual claims by authors rather than as a class action.

Nearly 300 authors filed five copyright complaints against Meta Platforms Inc. on October 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Meta Platforms Inc. argues that using copyrighted books to train AI models constitutes fair use under copyright law because the training transforms copies into new technology.

Anthropic urged US District Judge Eumi Lee on October 21, 2026, to rule that training its chatbot Claude on song lyrics is protected under the fair use doctrine.

In the Kadrey v. Meta Platforms class action, Judge Vince Chhabria ruled Meta's AI training on authors' books was fair use because plaintiffs failed to prove market harm from market dilution.

The $1.5 billion Anthropic class action settlement provides roughly $3,000 to each author who opted into the class.

The complaints allege Meta Platforms Inc. operated a book-scanning program called Project Vellum starting around mid-2025 that purchased and scanned physical books to train its Muse Spark and Muse Glimmer AI models.

The authors' complaints allege Meta Platforms Inc. downloaded e-books from pirate shadow libraries, including LibGen, Z-Library, Anna's Archive, and the Books3 dataset, to train its large language models.