Judgments cannot be determined solely by private litigation between parties.
Quote
Sources
Federal judge denies Ripple, SEC motion for indicative ruling
Referenced by
Judge Torres’s June 26 ruling emphasised the judiciary’s responsibility to uphold legal finality, rejecting efforts to override judgments through shifting enforcement priorities or mutual agreements between parties
Crypto news
Claim
Judge Torres emphasised that final court judgments are institutional decisions that serve the broader legal system, not just the disputing parties, and that any modification requires strict justification under Rule 60(b), citing Supreme Court precedent
Crypto news
Claim
The District Court’s denial of the Ripple & SEC joint motion underscored that final judgments cannot be revisited based on evolving regulatory agendas, reaffirming the judiciary’s role in preserving legal continuity amid political shifts
Crypto news
Claim
