Broader regulatory implications

Data block

Collection item

The District Court’s decision on Ripple & SEC joint motion reaffirmed that final judgments require justification beyond shifting regulatory agendas, emphasising the judiciary’s role in upholding legal continuity despite political changes
Judge Torres’s June 26 ruling emphasised the judiciary’s responsibility to uphold legal finality, rejecting efforts to override judgments through shifting enforcement priorities or mutual agreements between parties
The District Court’s denial of the Ripple & SEC joint motion underscored that final judgments cannot be revisited based on evolving regulatory agendas, reaffirming the judiciary’s role in preserving legal continuity amid political shifts

Data source type

Collection data source

Filter

{"where":{"AND":[{"attribute":"Jfmby78N4BCseZinBmdVov","is":"KeG9eTM8NUYFMAjnsvF4Dg"}]}}